Showing posts with label barnett formula. Show all posts
Showing posts with label barnett formula. Show all posts

Friday, 23 October 2015

RANDOM THOUGHTS ON THE LAST FEW DAYS: CHINA, NORTHERN POWERHOUSE AND EVEL

The last day of the charade that is the Golden Era celebration will be over today. After Mr Xi takes a trip to what the English call "The North", he will escape back to China.

In OUR United Kingdom though, "The North" isn't Shetland or Orkney, nor is it the Hebrides, Highlands, Central Belt, nor even the Southern Uplands. 

Nope, it is far south of all of these things. 

It's almost like the Brits drew a map and replaced the word Scotland with "Here be Dragons". Or Haggis!
This is where I left the kid.
The North is Manchester, some 200 kms south of Scotland, from where the Brits are going to build a Northern Powerhouse, presumably with Chinese money, becasue they have none themselves.

The cornerstone of this powerhouse will be, if they ever get it started, the High Speed Train from the centre of the universe that is London, to "The North". HS2.

The costs of the line are difficult to pin down. Having started off at a reasonable price of around £16 billion, the building of the line is now estimated by the English Transport Department to have risen to £43 billion. But we all know thay can;t count much after 20, so it is wise to look at other estimates. Boris Johnson, the London Mayor and MP, has it at £70 billion, and the Institute of Economic Affairs at £80 billion.  Bit of a difference there...
TGV Network running into Belgium, Luxembourg and Switzerland

A House of Lords Committee has suggested that the cost of building the line will be nine times more expensive than the French equivalent. The French of course had the foresight to build high speed trains (TGV) across the country decades ago when Mitterrand was president and Thatcher was favouring roads and private transport.

You might rub your hands together with glee, thinking that if Mr Osborne was pouring all this money into "The North" then there would be benefits for Scotland in the form of Barnett consequentials. But I fear you would be wrong.

There will be no consequentials, just as there were not for Crossrail or the Olympics.

This despite the fact that the negative impact of the line on certain areas outside of England (particularly including Eastern Scotland and South Wales) will be severe.

And now that we have EVEL, Scottish MPs won't even be allowed to vote on this railway which will have such a negative effect on our country. 

It's not just English foxes that will rue the passing of the EVEL bill last night and the second class status now accorded to our MPs.

(I wonder if that means that Muddle will be excluded from Cabinet when English matters are being discussed, or if the English Members of the Scottish Affairs Committee will now be excluded from the Scottish Affairs Committee... and, given that Scotland was excluded from this state visit, did Muddle have a meeting with President Xi... OK, silly question.)

The last few days have shown where the London government (which we can now reasonably call the English Government) places the Scots in OUR United Kingdom, the one that Cameron goes on and on about ad nauseam.

Roll on the next opportunity to, like Mr Xi, escape from this ridiculous and pathetic little third rate union.

Saturday, 1 November 2014

POLICE FEDERATION SUBMISSION TO THE SMITH COMMISSION

A summary of the Scottish Police Federation's submission to the Smith Commission. The full report can be found here.
The Scottish Police Federation believes it is in the interests of the people of Scotland to have a parliament with all necessary powers to ensure it can deliver the best possible life chances for our citizens, regardless of where they happen to live or how rich or poor they happen to be.

The Scottish Police Federation believes the Commission should endorse a statement that it is iniquitous that the Scottish people cannot directly determine the global funding arrangements for the Scottish Parliament.

The Scottish Police Federation believes the dates within which the Commission is expected to deliver were superficially determined and provide an unrealistic time frame in which to properly consider and evaluate any submissions that it receives.

The Scottish Police Federation believes the Commission should be able to continue its considerations beyond St Andrew's Night and if required to be able to make recommendations for draft clauses beyond Burns’ Night. 
They have to deal with some REALLY dodgy blokes
The Scottish Police Federation believes the Commission should make clear that regardless of its recommendations, there are no guarantees these will be delivered.

The Scottish Police Federation supports the view expressed by the Prime Minister that all options for devolution are possible and believes this statement should be the basis upon which this, and any future discussions on Scottish devolution is based.
The Scottish Police Federation believes that it is incumbent on all parties to set aside their pre referendum positions and work towards delivering proposals that will best deliver for the citizens of Scotland.

The Scottish Police Federation believes that ALL UK spending decisions should clearly identify by each budget line, the proportions of spending drawn from borrowings, income tax, national insurance, corporation tax, excise duties and any other clearly identifiable income stream.
 
The Scottish Police Federation believes that Scottish MPs should retain the ability to vote on any matter which may have a budgetary consideration or consequence for Scotland.

The Scottish Police Federation believes that any budget in England & Wales which is made up in any part from funding sources which are in themselves contributed to by the citizens in the devolved nations should continue to attract full Barnett consequentials.

The Scottish Police Federation believes that unless the relationship between the Scottish Parliament and Annually Managed Expenditure is addressed, that 'control' over income tax will prove to give the appearance of more powers without actually delivering so.

The Scottish Police Federation believes that Barnett bypass is manifestly unfair, deprives devolved administrations of funding that could be utilised to tackle social injustice and that in future only spending on defence, foreign affairs and the administration of the state should be capable of being categorised as being of UK wide significance.

The Scottish Police Federation asks the Commission to ask itself that if the further powers under consideration for transfer to the Scottish Parliament will not help address poverty and its associated devastating consequences, whether these powers go far enough?

The Scottish Police Federation believes that the greatest opportunity for public sector workers to be fairly rewarded and remunerated for the priceless role they perform in our society rests with increased powers for the Scottish Parliament. 

The Scottish Police Federation believes that cutting investment in the public sector actively undermines communities and stymies opportunities for growth and prosperity.

The Scottish Police Federation believes the Scottish Parliament should have full policy as well as legislative responsibility for public sector pensions in Scotland.

The Scottish Police Federation believes ALL revenues raised through the imposition of fines or proceeds of crime seizures (without limitation) should be retained in Scotland to provide the Scottish Government with additional resources to help those who need them most.

The Scottish Police Federation believes absolute authority and responsibility for counter terrorism policing in Scotland should rest with the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Scotland.

The Scottish Police Federation believes the Scottish Parliament should have full policy and legislative responsibility on all matters that are ultimately enforceable through the courts in Scotland.

Saturday, 28 June 2014

SNAPS ON SATURDAY

Even if you are not a fan of Jean-Claude Juncker or even the EU
 it is always refreshing to see pomposity and superiority
get its own rewards
You'd think that the best education that loads of money can buy
would have equipped Mr C with the knowledge of the constituent 

members of the kingdom
of which he is supposedly the senior minister.
What a week... humiliated, right, right and centre
What an exciting future on offer.
What a good use for a waste of card.
From the arch unionist...
I doubt if they do... Put education in the hands of the UK
and it becomes the most expensive in Europe
You have been warned...
And again...
while the Westminster crowd continue to indulge themselves
Like this flipping person...
And this beauty....
Stables no less...
Slim Jim too
Oh well, that's it. We can't have America upset.
But don't worry John. You're not prime minister any more.
It won't be you that get's the spanking.
It will be the Eton Toff. They are used to that.
I bet Selfridges sacked him for being useless.
Pimp my non existent Perugia university degree...
Cabinet Meeting
It's this pig again. (Apologies to pigs everywhere).
Safe as houses now.
And he still won't debate with people. He prefers to sell his boring book.
Yes, it's true ...I am fixated with him...
or at least with his wickedness.
The cheering thing, I suppose it, that there are kids who care enough to help
their starving friends in this third world oil rich nation.
If it's the people versus the government, then at least we will stick together
At long last, a partial acceptance that it's HIS fault
and the fault of his clique
Ahhhhh....socialism
True Tommy...
And maybe it's getting through around the country
Odd that...
Odd that too...
Odd that we never heard the truth...
From the old (even if he was attacked by some mad banshee of a woman)...
...to the younger...
...to the even younger.
And I'm not into celebrity endorsements.
"Sir" Sean can think what he likes; David Bowie too.
They are as entitled to an opinion as I am.
But Ucock keep force feeding us on their celebrities like Susan Boyle
and Jimmy Crankie who
are going to, or if they had a vote would, vote no.
It doesn't hurt to point out that Elijah, Paolo Nutini, Irving Welch,
Brian Cox, Annie Lennox and even Noel Gallagher are among those for YES.

Thursday, 26 December 2013

SNAPS FOR STEVEN'S FEAST

FRACKING MAP
So is this why we heard that the house of aristocrats and clergy removed the Scottish government's rights in respect of green energy?
Might get in the way of them making money
We are always hearing how many foreigners come here.
There are a lot of Brits who go there.

Still, it is one way of getting rid of the poor.
Only a one-off funeral grant to pay
Like Eton Boy would do it himself...
That's before we start saving on being big nobs in the world
Ah yes, these are all the things they prophesied in 1978
Let's see... No, no, no, no, Ha ha ha,
unfortunately no, we never had one (indeed is there one),
no, no, ooops, she did anyway,no, no.
Nothing out of twelve. Try again.
Oh wait, that's what they are doing! However, in fairness, 

as CH points out below, it's probably a spoof, 
given that the logo of the Lancaster Rose didn't appear till years after 
this poster would have appeared.
And  merry Christmas to you too Dave and Nick, you bastards.
Farce maybe?
What a happy Christmas that will be.
Are you old enough to remember when there was work for
thousands of men in these plants?
But clearly while the UK keeps its WMDs there,
you lot can just starve
Oh to be Icelandic, or at least to have their
autonomy to deal with thieves their way
It was Dave's idea; what did you expect?
Democracy? And how many of the Lords are millionaires?
And how many of the royals?
It's NOT all about the SNP or Alex Salmond
Two particularly repugnant specimens of  Tory
Some people have very strange friends
See, even St Vince says so
What a brilliant idea. We should have more like that.
Respect man. You get on down with the poor people, Dave.
Give him a hug, I dare you!
If you could call any of them "real"
So, when ukok tells you that Scotland, unlike Norway,
couldn't afford to pay the pensions, they are talking garbage.
The British government took the money for our pensions.
Just because they spent it on sucking up to George Bush
 and Ronnie Reagan doesn't make any difference.
They owe it to us.
Labour has said that Barnett  needs replaced with a "needs" formula, based no doubt in the Westminster Government's interpretation of need. So that will be like they didn't think we needed electric trains, or motorways, or television till years after England. Cameron says he has no plans to revise Barnett, but then, he had no plans to put up VAT just days before he put it up by 2.5%, and in any case, is there anything he hasn't lied about so far? As Marcia rightly points out, as  Scotland already pays more than £824 per person more than the rest of the Uk population the total subsidy would be £1,574 if their was a £4bn cut.