This blog supports Scottish Independence. Comments on it, and contents of linked blogs, do not necessarily reflect Munguin's opinions.
Thursday, 21 January 2010
WHY IS HARRIET GOING TO REVIVE THE CLASS WAR?
Harriet Harman is likely to reopen the class war tomorrow with a speech saying that it is still the biggest factor in determining individual achievement. She hopes to put the fight against inequality at the heart of the general election campaign.
According to the Guardian, Harman will talk about a government commissioned report by a panel chaired by Professor John Hills. It is anticipated that she will say that the report makes uncomfortable reading for the government and open a debate on the scale of the problems facing a class divided country.
She will say that public policy can still have a significant impact on inequality by intervening at certain key points in a person's life, such as pre-school years or re-entry into work after having children. She will insist that the big choice at the next election will be which party people trust to ensure that as a society "we do not return to the days when inequality was spiraling and where a tiny minority of the population got all the rewards".
In her speech to the leftwing pressure group Compass, Harman is expected to point out that how inequality is cumulative over an individual's lifetime and is carried from one generation to the next and that persistent inequality of class overarches the discrimination or disadvantage that can come from your gender, race or disability.
I am not a huge fan of Harman, as readers of this blog will doubtless know well, but in this matter I’m inclined to think that she has a point.
It seems to me that class is at the bottom of so many of our problems. I spent some time teaching languages with a group of people from accross Europe: France, Spain, Germany, Italy, Austria and Belgium, Luxembourg and Switzerland. As you might imagine they came from a variety of backgrounds and from geographical locations as far apart as the German-Polish border and the South of Spain. One thing that they had in common was their incredulity that class, accent and position played such a massive part in our lives.
In my opinion, compared with some of Harman’s more idiotic flights of fancy into for example, women’s rights, this speech may make some sense.
The report's findings, however, are politically sensitive since they will surely revive accusations that Labour is embarking on a class war. Whilst a government report cannot be hidden completely, given that the Prime Minister spent so much time last week denying class to be an issue in the Election camplaign, it is hard to see why Harman is taking it as the subject of a major speech.
Posturing for after the election perhaps?
Posted by Anonymous at 00:06
Labels: Compass, Gordon Brown, Harriet Harman
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Classy name - classy dame. She can talk the talk but can she walk the walk? Will she be beaten and broken by the clunking fist?ReplyDelete
It's just electioneering nonsense. Harperson has had 12 years to address class and did nothing. Inequality has also increased under Labour rather than decrease. And they've thrown in the towel on all of their targets on reducing poverty.ReplyDelete
It suits Labour to have a client underclass kept unemployed and on benefits to ensure re election. All ladders to social mobility such as the old academies and free university education were removed by Labour.
Evey socialist government eventually gets thrown out of power after trashing the economy and creating an explosion in public sector non jobs.
Labour don't give a damn about the underclasses. Voting fodder is all.ReplyDelete
Normally I can't stand her Brownlie, but in this case I think she's right..ReplyDelete
The clunking fist couldn't punch its way out of a wet paper bag these days.
Anon: It's pretty much true of everything they say now. If they haven't addressed it in 13 years, why would they bother now.... oh yeah, sorry, just remembered, there's an election coming up.ReplyDelete
As you say scunnert. If they care that much about the poor why are there more than there were after 18 years of Tory rule? And why are they comparatively poorer?ReplyDelete