Notwithstanding the fact that we have discussed changing electricity/gas suppliers and found that the majority opinion was that it was a waste of time (given that the companies appear to act as an illegal cartel, this is not surprising), George Osborne put his foot in his mouth when being interviewed by John Humphries.
Humphries asked him if he, like the leader of the opposition, Ed Miliband, had changed his energy supplier.
He replied: "I live in Downing Street"
The implication was, I guess, that these things don't concern him because he lives in a grace and favour home. He might also have said, 'I'm stinking rich, a few extra thousand a year on heating doesn't bother the likes of me. I'll not be freezing to death'.
On reflection though, I bet he wishes he could have that 2 minutes over again!
He's not the only one who suffered from "Foot in Mouth" though.
In a debate between the two Blairs at Dundee University, on the single British currency, Mr McDougall insisted that UK ministers were not stupid (an amazing statement on its own given virtually ALL of their policies). His words were that, they (UK ministers) would not act against Scotland until Scotland was confirmed in the union. They apparently aren't stupid enough to fall into that trap. I hope he was excluding IDS and Hunt from that particular accolade!
So from the mouth of the head of the Better Together campaign we hear an implied threat that UK ministers WILL act against Scotland if we vote no and thus confirm ourselves in the union. He obviously doesn't consider the removal of air bases as acting against the country. You have been warned.
Poor old McDougall. He really needs to get more rest.
And talking of debates between yes and no, I was pleased to see this comment from Joe Tallo on "Scotland's Big Debate on Facebook. He was talking about the Abertay University debate between Stewart Hosie MP and Baron Robertson of Gaelic Doesn't Exist on the Island of Islay. He asked people to share it, listen and learn... one man with facts, the other with gibberish.
Well said!
And on a final note...
The Conservative manifesto included a pledge to allow the subject of any petitions signed by a large number of the public to be discussed by parliament. A pledge perhaps that with hindsight they would have been wiser not to make, and given their record of breaking pledges, one they were ill-advised to keep, while discarding so many others.
It was inevitable that the vexed question of Europe would arise at some point, given that there are vast swathes of the UK where the EU and all its doings are as popular as stomach cramps. Why no one foresaw yesterday's situation, and why no one had thought out plans on how to deal with it leaves me with a sinking feeling of incredulity and, frankly, fear. For if the government cannot act to protect itself, how on earth will it ever protect us.
We all know what happened. Cameron invested his own reputation in the debate, his ability to spin and sell, his authority and backed it up with a series of punishments to be meted out to miscreants who failed to vote with his three line whip. And still they ignored him. In vast numbers. 81 Tories voted against the government; it's thought that a further 15 abstained.
Why did they do it? Cameron demands loyalty and respect from his backbenchers. He comes from the kind of privilege that tends to get its way, and he doesn't care to be made to look weak. So there will be retribution. But as the BBC's Nick Robinson explained, these MPs were acting either on deeply held convictions, or from fear that if they defied their constituents (or at least their constituency members) they would not be selected next time round. As for the threats of promotion blocking? Most of them are middle aged men, and they know that any promotions will go to either Liberal Democrats or to Tory women (because Cameron needs to mend fences with female electors and he is under some sort of misapprehension that they way to do this is to promote female MPs). So they are risking little.
Cameron has promised EU reform and the repatriation of powers from Brussels (mostly in the form of employment law), achieved by holding a veto over the head of the €uro block which will almost inevitably move towards closer fiscal union (so that countries like Greece can be held accountable for their finances, and elsewhere even elderly gigolos will have to make an attempt at running their country between buying chasing young skirt. But like most of what Cameron says, it was froth and bubbles: this year, next year, sometime, never. And clearly his backbenchers, or around 90 of them, thought that too.
Is he wounded? Yes. Fatally? Doubtful, at least in the immediately future. I expect a lot of anti-Europe rhetoric now. Already responsibility for the mess that we call the British economy has transferred from the last government to the €uro-zone, seamlessly, without touching the Tories. But backbench MPs are politicians too. They can spot flannel at a mile away. Perhaps from today the coalition of two, is now a coalition of three. The Tories, the Liberals and the Other Tories.
One piece of advice for Cameron from Munguin's Republic. If you are looking for an attack dog to take John Humphries to pieces the morning after the night before, don't ever, ever again send wee Govey. He was catastrophic this morning as he stuttered and stammered about being €urosceptic, and the prime minister being erm, €urosceptic and colleagues and ...erm friends in the party, and erm...respect and erm bringing back power, erm, what? ...erm some powers, erm sometime, erm.....
If Cameron was listening he must have been hiding his head in his hands as disaster unfolded on the radio. Tony Blair was scared of Humphries. That should tell you all you need to know.
