This blog supports Scottish Independence. Comments on it, and contents of linked blogs, do not necessarily reflect Munguin's opinions.
Showing posts with label New Labour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New Labour. Show all posts
Wednesday, 22 July 2015
Sunday, 14 December 2014
SNAPS ON SUNDAY...THE NEW ERA FOR NEW OLD LABOUR...or something
We'll have a little more fun at Jim and Kez's expense, then, we promise, we shall move on.
A good deal has already been said on these pages about the strange choice of a right wing leader and deputy leader for a party which appears to need, more than anything, to shore up its left of centre votes; about the choice of a party leader, in a branch desperately trying to show that London does not control what Scottish Labour thinks or does, who sits in Westminster and was the clear choice of the Westminster management to sort out the rebellious Jocks, and at least at this moment, who has shadow cabinet responsibility under Ed Miliband for a non devolved area.
Of course we can expect him to get an easy ride from the BBC... and from what I heard he got exactly that this morning. No-one questioned what he will do about his Westminster seat come May; no one asked what he will do if he fails to be elected to either Westminster or Holyrood.
But at some stage in the future, surely someone from the BBC is bound to, even in the interests of appearing to be some sort of serious journalist... (so that means Brewer, and not Smith) ... question what his line is now on tuition fees, privatisation of health and water, post office, rail, electricity and gas; on nuclear weapons (that the Scottish branch voted against) 25 miles from Glasgow; on Palestine, MPs' expenses, the House of Lords, royals, benefit caps, Atos-style assessments, benefit sanctioning, bedroom tax, pensions; on Israel, Iraq, Syria, Scottish complicity in torture... (he was SoS when the torturees were landing at Prestwick) and why in 2009, he was allegedly involved in the setting up of a cross party coalition which wanted to stop there even being a referendum in Scotland, whilst operating a scam on his rent!
We can be fairly certain of what his views were on some of these issues last week... but it would be interesting to know what are they now, and what they might be if ever he were to be first minister of our country?
It must be comforting though, for Jim to know, that he has already started to do what any new leader should, and attracted new members to the party....albeit from the Conservatives (their money is as good as anyone's... and there's usually a lot of it). Nice folk too... if you like that sort of thing.
Anyway... here are a few of my favourite snaps on this Sunday, celebrating Jim and Kez's crowning.
The mums? Back to nice, neat, gendered roles then? And of course playing to a ludicrous notion that working class women can’t read.
Eh…no. Why should the public purse subsidise profit-making companies?
That would be a postcode lottery then…and it would be a lottery that allows businesses to influence (read “lobby”) local politicians’ decisions in terms of welfare. Not a good idea.
A good deal has already been said on these pages about the strange choice of a right wing leader and deputy leader for a party which appears to need, more than anything, to shore up its left of centre votes; about the choice of a party leader, in a branch desperately trying to show that London does not control what Scottish Labour thinks or does, who sits in Westminster and was the clear choice of the Westminster management to sort out the rebellious Jocks, and at least at this moment, who has shadow cabinet responsibility under Ed Miliband for a non devolved area.
Of course we can expect him to get an easy ride from the BBC... and from what I heard he got exactly that this morning. No-one questioned what he will do about his Westminster seat come May; no one asked what he will do if he fails to be elected to either Westminster or Holyrood.
But at some stage in the future, surely someone from the BBC is bound to, even in the interests of appearing to be some sort of serious journalist... (so that means Brewer, and not Smith) ... question what his line is now on tuition fees, privatisation of health and water, post office, rail, electricity and gas; on nuclear weapons (that the Scottish branch voted against) 25 miles from Glasgow; on Palestine, MPs' expenses, the House of Lords, royals, benefit caps, Atos-style assessments, benefit sanctioning, bedroom tax, pensions; on Israel, Iraq, Syria, Scottish complicity in torture... (he was SoS when the torturees were landing at Prestwick) and why in 2009, he was allegedly involved in the setting up of a cross party coalition which wanted to stop there even being a referendum in Scotland, whilst operating a scam on his rent!
We can be fairly certain of what his views were on some of these issues last week... but it would be interesting to know what are they now, and what they might be if ever he were to be first minister of our country?
![]() |
| Aww isn't that nice. Con and Lab are all friends now. Sod the poor then? |
Anyway... here are a few of my favourite snaps on this Sunday, celebrating Jim and Kez's crowning.
![]() |
| Yep! Seems like a reasonable assumption. |
![]() |
| My ex-MP seems to have seen what Labour hasn't. |
![]() |
| Russell Brand started a craze. |
![]() |
| Is that tree in London? |
![]() |
| Seriously ...these people fund Labour. |
![]() |
| He must be very rich by now... Rich enough to be a Tory. |
On education – “How do you get the youngsters to
a better position? It’s about the mums being better readers and preparing the
kids for day one at school.”
The mums? Back to nice, neat, gendered roles then? And of course playing to a ludicrous notion that working class women can’t read.
On tax relief for firms – “We also need to get
better at using the tools available to our local authorities, such as tax
relief for firms paying the Living Wage.”
Eh…no. Why should the public purse subsidise profit-making companies?
On the Smith Commission – “As we implement the
Smith Agreement we should seek to bring these new powers as close to local
communities as is possible. We should devolve not just to councils but also to
local coalitions involving councils, business, charities and other government
agencies like the NHS.”
That would be a postcode lottery then…and it would be a lottery that allows businesses to influence (read “lobby”) local politicians’ decisions in terms of welfare. Not a good idea.
1. Authoritarianism. In 1996 Jim Murphy graced the
House of Commons for the first time when he was the subject of an unprecedented
‘Early Day Motion’ which condemned his presidency of the National Union of
Students (NUS) for “intolerant and dictatorial behaviour”. He had engaged in a
furious campaign of persecution against NUS officials who supported NUS policy
of free education at a time when (as today) Labour Party policy was against
free education. Murphy left the NUS for a job in the Labour Party.
2. Fingers in the till. In 2012 Jim Murphy was found
to have exploited a loophole in his parliamentary expenses, by letting out his
London address at the same time as claiming its rent. He is believed to have
made anywhere up to £20,000. Incredibly, he was carrying out this scheme when
in 2009 he apologised “on behalf of all politicians” for expenses theft.
3. Staunch defence of Israel. In 2001 and 2002 Jim
Murphy was the chair of ‘Labour Friends of Israel’. During his tenure war
criminal and architect of the massacres at Sabra and Shatila, Ariel Sharon,
became Prime Minister of Israel and construction of the now infamous West Bank
Barrier began.
In 2011 he attacked the Trades Union Congress for
supporting the boycott, calling it “a big step backwards” and also criticised
student campaigners pushing for an academic boycott. He dismissed a UN vote to
recognise the Palestinian state as ‘symbolic’. He insisted that the Labour
Party under Ed Miliband must remain a ‘staunch supporter of Israel’. There is
no evidence that recent massacres -particularly in Gaza – have changed is
attitude.
Support for the Apartheid state was once widespread in
the Labour party. Following decades of genocide against the Palestinians it is
now widely recognised as an extremist position.
4. Leading Membership of the Henry Jackson Society. Blairism
in foreign policy terms is a form of Neo-Conservatism. But it is very rare for
a Blairite to openly subscribe to Neo-Conservative ideology.
Jim Murphy is a member of the ‘Political Council’ of the
HJS – he is one of a few fanatical Blairites on the Political Council which is
utterly dominated by Conservative ultra-reactionary back benchers – the same
ones who are now calling for a coalition with UKIP.
Henry Jackson was a military hawk and ‘anti-communist’
McCarthyite senator. The society named after him, founded in the U.S but
transported to London in the run-up to the Iraq war, is the main bastion of
Neo-Conservatism on these islands.
![]() |
| If the unions disaffiliate, Labour will have to become even more right wing to attract big business's money. |
![]() |
| But it seems his meeting with the ex-pope has bestowed something upon him. |
![]() |
| Small problem! |
![]() |
| I'd hang on to that jaicket if I were you! |
![]() |
| But certainly a patroniser of women, none the less! |
![]() |
| Yes Frankie, here is it. |
![]() |
| Lewis... |
Labels:
Conservatives,
Jim Murphy,
labour,
New Labour,
Trades Unions
Wednesday, 19 December 2012
WHY DO WE HAVE A TORY GOVERNMENT? WE DIDN'T VOTE TORY!
Una, an ex-Labour party person who got fed up with New Labour... and who wants an independent Scotland so that she can have a Labour, a real Labour government, in a democracy, and who doesn't see why we should have a Tory government, when we didn't vote Tory.
Labels:
New Labour,
Newsnet Scotland,
Scotland,
Tory government
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
























