Showing posts with label Stephen Crabb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen Crabb. Show all posts

Tuesday, 5 July 2016

THE CURRENT SECOND FAVOURITE TO WIN...

Is it any wonder I mistakenly thought her name was Andrea Loathsome? 

No minimum wage? So employers can go back to the good old Thatcher days of paying £1 an hour. And, of course, you'll have to claim benefits and be labelled a scrounger by some coked up toff.

No maternity rights? So you give birth Monday afternoon in the office toilets and straight back to work or you're fired?

No unfair dismissal rights? So you can be sacked without notice for wearing the wrong hairstyle or being a minute late, and then be called a scrounger for claiming benefits?

No pension rights? So that after a lifetime service you can be chucked out at whatever they've put the pension age up to, without a penny and only the horrifically inadequate state pension to live on. And, needless to say, you will have to claim pension credits and housing benefits and be called a scrounger? 

And what kind of employee does she think will work for this kind of employer? Presumably someone forced to by the unlovely Crabb man on pain of NOT being allowed to claim benefits, but still being called a scrounger for trying to.

No wonder the officials at the Treasury said she was the worst minister they had ever had, with no grasp of issues and even the terminally dim Gidiot wanted her moved.

I'm begin to wonder how she manages to get herself out of bed in the morning without some help!
**********
If you fancy a laugh over the leadership contenders, listen to Ken Clarke discussing them with Rifkind.

Fox and Crabb have gone now (how embarrassingly low their votes were, showing even Tories MPs don't think much of them). Wee Govey is last, which leaves the contest looking like it's between Leadsom and May. What a bloody choice! 

Attila the Hun or her stunt double!

Saturday, 2 July 2016

SMILE ON SATURDAY

ONE OF THESE IS THE FUTURE PRIME MINISTER

Smile! Think of your GO HOME vans or denying unaccompanied refugee kids access to UK, or throwing Australian families out of Scotland. Yep, that's not bad considering it's you.
Unfortunately, it's not the turtle that's standing.
Nice going, Crabbie.
At this rate you'll be able to retire before the contest and save us all some sleepless nights.
You can't have one without the other...
Oh, and we can't forget Adam, can we?
Did she borrow her wellies from Theresa?
Maybe she was prompted to put her name forward because she's called LEAD SOM(E). Can't think of any other plausible reason.

Sunday, 22 May 2016

RANDOM THOUGHTS

You'll love this one (well most of you will).

Suffolk Tories apparently accepted an illegal donation of £3,000 during the last election. There's no question about it. They owned up. The person who donated the money was not on the electoral register at the time the money was given.

The electoral commission ruled that they should be fined the sum of £1,100, but should not be required to return the donation.

If my arithmetic is right, they get a donation of £3,000, they are fined £1,100, so their net gain is £1,900. Not much of a punishment; not much of a disincentive to repeat the crime next time round.

Still, it's the Tories. They appear do whatever they want and walk off laughing.
**********

Erm, has Harriet joined the Tory party? We all know she is aristocratic and it wouldn't be stretching the imagination much to guess that she loathes Mr Corbyn, but what's this about. Don't tell us they just banged into each other.  

Waitrose I might just about swallow, but ASDA? Please!

Dodgy Dave down with people again, innit? Top button undone, not singing God Save the Queen (tut tut, what would your mother say Dodge?), but wearing a suit that cost more that the bloke he's talking to earns in a year. 
**********
A few months ago, the gross old duke of York was unhappy that he couldn't get through the gates at Windsor Great Park, where he has one of his houses...well, one of OUR houses. Apparently the mechanism for automatic opening had failed. So the fat boy decided that, as he had a great big 2.5 tonne, £80,000 Range Rover, he'd just smash the gates down...as you would, if a £5,000 repair to your car were of no interest.

The alternative would have been a 1 mile... yes a whole mile...detour. How utterly ghastly!

Well obviously a royal highness couldn't be expected to put up with that kind of inconvenience, so he broke the gates down. OUR gates that WE paid for.

If you lived in your own home and you decided that you would trash your gates to save yourself a little inconvenience, that would be your business. If you lived in a council house, or one owned by a housing association or the state, then it becomes their business.

Most people would call it criminal damage and charges would be brought.

Needless to say Air Miles is getting off Scot free.
**********
**********

The same goes for tax pounds. 

Every so often David Cameron reminds us we are a Christian country. I can't imagine why he would do that unless he was trying to stir up bad feeling with Muslims or Jews or some other religious groups: Ya know, make them feel ill at ease, not at home?

But the very people who might be considered to know a little bit more about Christian values than Dodgy Dave, that is to say the bishops of the State Church, are rather less than enthusiastic about his policies.

Not that Church of England bishops are the only ones to criticise. The leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales has also laid into the Tories for their heartlessness in welfare reforms. Odd given what a devout Catholic Iain Duncan Smith is.
And even odder that his replacement is one of these OTT Christians that tells us prayer can cure anything... and apparently people with Parkinson's should just get out there and get a job.

Every year some of us (admittedly a dwindling number) listen to Her Majesty's Christmas message. It's a mixture of her family news, the stuff some folk write in long tedious letters at Christmas, but she gets to put on the BBC (ya know, Andrew losing his rag with a gate; the number of holidays that the blood princesses have taken; how little work William and Kate have done; how much money they screwed out of the people of Cornwall to keep Mrs Parker Bowles in diamond tiaras, etc) together with a religious message. 

She invariably talks about how she has tried to follow the teachings of Christ all of her life in everything she does. Clearly she misses out the bit about the rich man and the eye of the needle, given her immense wealth, and the "suffer the little children" bit of these teachings. 

Probably feeding the 5000 passes her by, as within a few miles of Buckingham Palace some of her loyal subjects are sleeping in cardboard boxes and eating out of soup kitchens. Children subjects of hers have little or noting to eat due to the policies that she reads out from her gold throne with her multi million pound hat on her head, having stepped out of a gold coach.

It's a long time since I was forced, in this Christian country, to read the bible as part of my core curriculum, but I can recall all of those things even if I maybe don't always live up to them. It's strange that the queen has such problems with them, having dedicated her life to following such teachings.